Based on the above ideas, we can confirm that the legal person is a legal creation whose task is to identify the subjects of certain rights and obligations and to give legitimacy to the actions carried out in accordance with these rights and obligations. Since legal personality is a prerequisite for legal capacity (the capacity of any legal person to modify (conclude, transfer, etc.) its rights and obligations), it is a prerequisite for an international organization to be able to sign international treaties in its own name. According to this theory, there are no elements to identify what a legal entity is. However, an inert asset is not likely to create a legal relationship. This requires either a natural person or a legal person with free will. For a legal person to develop a legal expression, it requires free will, as this is necessary to produce a legal effect, and also has the additional effect of distinguishing it from other parties to that legal relationship. The legal capacity of natural persons and their differences. This is based, on the one hand, on the legal capacity of natural persons, which is defined in the statutes of the association. On the other hand, it includes the study of facilities intended to compensate for the deficiencies of natural persons. However, the application of this theory has resorted to the technique of insult to the legal person to ignore the legal status of the company, to penetrate it in order to reach its shareholders, to lift the « veil » of the legal person.

In Act II, scene 1 of Gilbert and Sullivan`s 1889 opera The Gondoliers, Giuseppe Palmieri (who, with his brother Marco, is king of Barataria) asks that he and his brother be recognized separately so that they can each receive individual portions of food, because they have « two independent appetites ». However, it is rejected by the court (composed of other gondoliers) because the common rule ». is a legal person, and legal persons are solemn things. Artificial personality, legal personality or legal personality is the characteristic of a non-living entity that legally has the status of personality. For Kelsen, natural and legal persons are subject to rights and obligations. In general, only human beings can be considered natural persons, as they can acquire rights and fulfill (or violate) duties through their behavior. Natural and legal persons have acts that are understood as legal obligations and subjective rights that make up this entity. The reasoning behind this theory stems from the « abuse » of the company`s legal entity by managers by using it as a « screen » for their own personal reasons, thereby protecting themselves from liability arising from their breach of contract. In doing so, they violate the interests of others and do not respect the law.

Can I get all legal entities in PDF format Brazilian law recognizes any association or abstract entity as a legal entity, but a registry is required by a constitutional document, with specifications that depend on the category of legal entity and the local law of the state and city. I think every person is a legal person. In this regard, there are legal entities (Inc., companies, etc.) and, for example, IE or a single citizen (or villager). Lingg,34 who defended this theory starts from the idea that only humans are real and can do work; Consequently, legal personality can only be attributed to individuals and not to States. Since the 19th century, the legal person has been interpreted more broadly to make it a citizen, domicile or domicile of a state (usually for the purposes of personal jurisdiction). In Louisville, C. & C.R. Co.

v. Letson, 2 Wie. 497, 558, 11 L.Ed. 353 (1844), United States The Supreme Court held that for the purposes of this case, a corporation « may be treated both as a citizen [of the State which created it] and as a natural person. » Ten years later, they confirmed Letson`s conclusion, albeit on the slightly different theory that « those who use the company`s name and exercise the powers it confers » should be conclusively regarded as citizens of the company`s founding state. Marshall v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 16 Wie. 314, 329, 14 L.Ed. 953 (1854). These concepts have been codified by law because U.S. jurisdiction laws relate specifically to corporate domicile.

The term « legal person » can be ambiguous as it is often used as a synonym for terms that refer only to non-human legal persons, especially as opposed to « natural person ». [10] [11] In summary, fictional theory equates personality with the ability to exercise certain rights. It also compares legally incapable natural persons with legal persons, since both fictitious legal persons and natural persons suffering from capitis deminutio cannot exercise their will solely in the context of a legal relationship and require a representative to exercise the rights conferred on them by law. Savigny12 sees the legal person as a created being artificially capable of possessing a good but devoid of free will. It regarded capital companies as exclusive creations of rights which do not exist apart from their individual members, which form the group of companies and whose shares are imputed to the company. the obligations and obligations incurred by the business unit; and In many cases, fundamental human rights are implicitly granted only to natural persons.